How Silicon Valley Startups Should Scope a UX/UI Audit and Product Design Roadmap Engagement

Introduction

When a product is underperforming, many Silicon Valley startups jump straight into redesigning screens or adding features. Without a clear scope for a UX/UI audit and a structured product design roadmap, you risk spending a lot of time and money without fixing the real problems. A well scoped engagement helps you understand where the product is breaking down, what to fix first, and how to phase the work in a way that supports growth.

Quick Answer Box

Silicon Valley startups should scope a UX/UI audit and product design roadmap engagement by first defining specific performance problems, then outlining which journeys, features, and platforms will be audited, what research and analytics inputs are required, and what concrete deliverables are expected. From there, the team should agree on a phased roadmap that prioritizes the highest impact fixes for activation and retention, a clear timeline, and an engagement model that aligns the UX/UI partner with product and engineering capacity.

1. Start With Clear Problems And Outcomes For The Underperforming Product

A UX/UI audit is only useful if it focuses on the right problems. Begin by clarifying why the product is considered underperforming.

1.1 Describe how performance is falling short

Write down the specific symptoms your team sees, for example:

• Low activation rate after signup
• High churn in the first 60 or 90 days
• Users relying heavily on support to complete basic tasks
• Features that were built but rarely used
• Stakeholders complaining that dashboards or reports are confusing

Use metrics where you have them, such as conversion percentages or churn rates, even if they are rough.

1.2 Translate symptoms into engagement goals

Turn these symptoms into clear goals for the audit and roadmap, such as:

• Identify the top five UX issues blocking activation
• Reduce time to first value for new accounts
• Clarify navigation and information architecture for core workflows
• Improve adoption of one or two strategic features

These goals set the boundaries of the engagement and help you avoid an unfocused, endless audit.

2. Decide Which Journeys, Features, And Platforms Are In Scope

An underperforming product rarely needs every screen redesigned at once. Scoping is about choosing where the UX/UI partner will focus.

2.1 Prioritize the most critical user journeys

List your key journeys and choose which ones are in scope, such as:

• Signup and onboarding
• First project or workspace setup
• Main daily or weekly workflow
• Reporting and insights review
• Upgrade and renewal flows

Mark each journey as in scope or out of scope for this engagement. Be realistic about what can be deeply audited within the budget and timeline.

2.2 Decide which platforms and form factors to include

Clarify whether the audit covers:

• Web app only
• Web and mobile web
• Native mobile apps
• Internal tools or admin panels

If you include multiple platforms, specify where the primary focus should be. For example, you might prioritize the desktop experience for admins and only sample mobile patterns for now.

2.3 Call out dependencies and out of scope areas

Identify parts of the product that are technically or organizationally hard to change, such as legacy billing flows or third party embedded modules. Mark them as constraints so the UX/UI partner knows where they can propose changes and where they need to work around existing systems.

3. Define The Research And Analytics Inputs For The Audit

A strong UX/UI audit combines qualitative and quantitative insights. Scoping the engagement means defining what inputs you will provide and what the partner will collect.

3.1 Share existing product data and insights

Gather key artifacts that will inform the audit, such as:

• Funnel reports for signup, onboarding, and key workflows
• Cohort and retention analyses for important segments
• Heatmaps or session recordings if you have them
• Support tickets, chat logs, and feedback tagged by feature or topic

Decide which of these you will provide at the start and where you expect the partner to help make sense of the data.

3.2 Decide on new research activities

Agree on which new research activities are in scope, for example:

• Heuristic review of key flows
• Task based usability testing with target users
• Short interviews with churned or at risk customers
• Surveys or in product questionnaires at critical steps

Specify how many sessions, with which user segments, and who is responsible for recruiting. Some Silicon Valley teams work with partners like Ankord Media when they want support combining product analytics with lean user research to inform the roadmap.

3.3 Set expectations for stakeholder input

Clarify which internal stakeholders the partner should talk to, such as:

• Product managers who own the underperforming areas
• Customer success or support leads
• Sales or solutions teams who see friction during demos and onboarding

Include this in the scope as a small number of structured conversations so the audit reflects what your teams already know.

4. Outline The Core Deliverables From The UX/UI Audit

Before you sign an engagement, define exactly what you expect the UX/UI audit to produce.

4.1 Prioritized list of UX and UI issues

Ask for a structured list of findings, including:

• Clear descriptions of each issue
• Screenshots or recordings that show the problem
• Impact estimates tied to activation, retention, or other goals
• Suggested level of effort where possible

This list should be prioritized so your team can focus on the highest value opportunities first.

4.2 Updated journeys, flows, and information architecture

The audit should not only list problems. It should propose better structures, such as:

• Updated user journey maps for key flows
• Revised navigation and information architecture
• Simplified task flows for critical workflows

These artifacts bridge the gap between findings and actual design work in the roadmap.

4.3 Experience principles and design guidelines

Ask the partner to codify a small set of experience principles or design guidelines based on the audit, for example:

• How users should feel at each key moment
• How to handle errors, empty states, and edge cases
• How to present complex data in a clear way

These can guide future product decisions even after the engagement ends.

5. Scope The Product Design Roadmap Around Impact And Feasibility

Once you understand the issues, you need a roadmap that reflects both impact and what your team can deliver.

5.1 Group opportunities into themes and phases

Work with the partner to organize findings into themes such as:

• Activation and onboarding
• Navigation and wayfinding
• Core workflow simplification
• Insights and reporting clarity

Then arrange them into phases, for example:

• Phase 1: High impact, low effort improvements to onboarding and navigation
• Phase 2: Deeper redesign of core workflows
• Phase 3: Longer term changes to information architecture and data presentation

Each phase should have a clear set of design and implementation tasks.

5.2 Align roadmap priorities with team capacity

Review the proposed roadmap with product and engineering leads to:

• Check feasibility within your release cadence
• Adjust scope to match available design and development capacity
• Sequence work so critical fixes for activation and retention come first

A good roadmap respects both user needs and practical constraints.

5.3 Decide how detailed design work fits into the roadmap

Clarify whether the engagement includes:

• High level concepts only
• Detailed interaction design and specs for specific flows
• Design system updates or component library work

This affects how much effort the partner will spend on design versus strategy and how handoffs to engineering will work.

6. Set Timeline, Engagement Model, And Collaboration Norms

Finally, scope how the engagement will run day to day.

6.1 Choose a realistic timeline with clear milestones

Define a timeline that includes:

• Audit discovery and research period
• Synthesis and findings review
• Roadmap definition and alignment
• Optional early design work on top priorities

Attach rough dates or sprint numbers to each stage so expectations are clear.

6.2 Decide on the engagement model

Clarify whether the partner will work:

• As a fixed project with a defined end date
• On a short project followed by an ongoing, lighter retainer
• Embedded with your team for a specific period

Make sure the model fits how quickly you need to move and how much internal support you have.

6.3 Define collaboration and communication

Agree on the basics before you start, such as:

• Weekly or biweekly check in cadence
• Shared tools for design files, documentation, and feedback
• Who signs off on scope changes, design decisions, and roadmap priorities

This reduces friction once the work begins and helps everyone stay aligned.

Final Tips

• Scope around outcomes. Use activation, retention, and other product goals to decide which parts of the product and which activities belong in the audit and roadmap.
• Be selective. Focus the engagement on a few critical journeys and problems rather than trying to review every part of an underperforming product at once.
• Plan the follow through. Treat the UX/UI audit and roadmap as the start of an improvement cycle, not the end, and make sure the scope includes enough detail to guide real design and implementation work.

‍